雷价通
Plan Framing · Official Rates · Community Signal
Membership Rates
Vendor FramingReal Usage Feel
This page puts OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, and other plan systems side by side,
so you can read the official framing first and then layer in community signal for real workload intensity.
Open Rate BoardSee Plan Pricing
vendor rate board

Pricing, benefits, and quota framing are organized from official pages. Community notes are for workload feel only.

Hobby
Cursor
Free
Official page prevails
No credit card needed. Best for testing the editor, Tab, and limited agent requests.
  • No credit card required
  • Limited agent requests
  • Limited Tab completions
  • Good for validating the IDE workflow
Pro
Cursor
$20 / mo.
Official page prevails
The main solo tier for everyday coding, bug fixing, and medium-frequency agent use.
  • Everything in Hobby
  • Expanded agent limits
  • Access to frontier models
  • MCP, skills, and hooks
  • Cloud agents
  • Usage-based Bugbot
Teams
Cursor
$40 / user / mo.
Official page prevails
Built for shared context, rules, security review, and centralized management.
  • Everything in Pro
  • Cloud agents with shared team context
  • Team rules, skills, and automation
  • Security review agents
  • SAML/OIDC SSO and team privacy mode
  • Usage analytics and unified billing
Enterprise
Cursor
Custom
Official page prevails
Adds invoicing, shared usage pools, SCIM, audit logs, and more granular admin control.
  • Everything in Teams
  • Shared usage pools
  • Invoice and purchase-order billing
  • SCIM seat management
  • AI code-tracking API and audit logs
  • Granular admin and model controls
  • Priority support and customer success
Official Source:Cursor Official Page

Cursor Tier Matrix

Official Framing + Community Signal

Built from public docs first. When exact counts are not public, tier descriptions and community signal fill the gap.

DimensionWindowEntryMidHighCommunity Signal
Agent requestsBy plan / monthHobby: limited requestsPro: expanded limitsTeams/Enterprise: shared governance and team contextThe gap from Pro to team tiers becomes much more obvious on large multi-file repos than on plain autocomplete.
Model and workflow depthBy featureHobby: basic Tab and agentPro: frontier models + MCP + cloud agentsEnterprise: model control + audit + shared poolsWhether it feels worth the price usually depends on agent-heavy usage rather than chat-style usage alone.
Community Note
Peak queueing, agent speed, and stability on large multi-file repos are the most discussed quality signals.
Community Note
Heavy agent users care more about fast quota than single-completion latency.
Community Note
If Cursor is your main IDE, monthly headroom and queue behavior matter more than sticker price per seat.